The Implementation of E-Musrenbang Website to Increase Community Participation in Development Planning during Covid-19 Pandemic (Case Study of Glintung Water Street in Purwantoro Kota Malang)

Sekar Ayu Wandyra, Saiman Saiman

Abstract


Regional development planning meetings (Musrenbang) are facilities that are facilitated by local governments to participate in regional development planning once a year. Community involvement is a very important element in the development process. The existence of technological advances that are currently developing does not prevent community participation in the musrenbang. E-Musrenbang is an application developed by the Regional Development Planning Agency (BAPEDDA) as part of the implementation of musrenbang activities. The purpose of this study is to analyze the application of community participation in development planning through the e-musrenbang website. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method. Data were collected through technical observation techniques on the people involved in the Tangguh Village development program. The results of this study are the use of e-musrenbang in planning Tangguh Village in Purwantoro Village is still not good, because the socialization carried out by the organizers has not been evenly distributed to the village level so that people do not understand and know the benefits of E-Musrenbang related to the proposals.


Keywords


e-musrenbang; development planning; covid-19 pandemic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adisasnita, Rahardjo. 2006. Pembangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Akbar GG, Kania I, Ulumudin A, et al. (2019) Innovation in the Public Sector: The effectiveness of ‘LAPOR!’ as one of the Smart City Programs in Bandung. In: International Symposium on Social Sciences, Education, and Humanities (ISSEH 2018), March 2019, pp. 297–302. Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/isseh-18.2019.69.

Anindito DB and Sutriadi R (2016) Towards a Just City in Information Era: Understanding the Inclusiveness of Community Network Induced by Telecommunication Technology at the Local Level (Case Study: Cihapit and Cipaganti Neighborhoods, Bandung City, Indonesia). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227. CITIES 2015: Intelligent Planning Towards Smart Cities: 255–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.069.

Bara, A., et.al. (2021). The Effectiveness of Advertising Marketing in Print Media during the Covid 19 Pandemic in the Mandailing Natal Region. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 4 (1): 879-886.

Bintari A and Akbar I (2017) Collaborative Planning in Policy-Making Process in Bandung City. In: Unhas International Conference on Social and Political Science (UICoSP 2017), October 2017. Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/uicosp-17.2017.9.

Bobbio L (2019) Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society 38(1): 41–57. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193.

Brabham DC (2009) Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory 8(3): 242–262. DOI: 10.1177/1473095209104824.

Callahan, K. (2007). Elements of effective governance: Measurement, accountability, and participation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Taylor & Francis Group.

Cornwall, 2008. Unpacking Participations: Models, Meaning and Practices, Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal.

Edgar, Rifki. (2021). Musrenbang RKPD 2022, Pemkot Malang Fokus Pemulihan Ekonomi Melalui Ekraf. Dari website: https://jatim.tribunnews.com/2021/03/25/musrenbang-rkpd-2022-pemkot-malang-fokus-pemulihan-ekonomi-melalui-ekraf.

Franceschini S and Marletto GE (2019) The dynamics of trust during public participation. Papers in Regional Science 98(4): 1713–1729. DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12426.

Fung A (2006) Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review66(s1): 66–75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x

Fung A, Gilman HR and Shkabatur J (2015) Technology for Democracy in Development: Lessons from Seven Case Studies. In: Deliberation and Development: Rethinking the Role of Voice and Collective Action in Unequal Societies. Equity and Development. The World Bank, pp. 229–236. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0501-1_ch11.

Laksana, Nuring, S. 2012. Bentuk-Bentuk Partisipasi Masyarakat Desa Dalam Program Desa Siaga di Desa Bandung Kecamatan Playen Kabupaten Gunung Kidul Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Skripsi: Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya.

Lee Y and Schachter HL (2019) Exploring the Relationship between Trust in Government and Citizen Participation. International Journal of Public Administration 42(5): 405–416. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1465956.

Mandarano L, Meenar M and Steins C (2010) Building Social Capital in the Digital Age of Civic Engagement. Journal of Planning Literature 25(2): 123–135. DOI:10.1177/0885412210394102.

Masbuhin AT, Alim MN and Tarjo T (2017) The phenomenon of musrenbang in terms of local wisdom: An effort to prevent corruption in the local government. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal 3(2): 365–373. Available at: http://apfjournal.or.id/index.php/apf/article/view/91

Memontum.com. (2021). Musrenbang RKPD Kota Malang Tahun 2021 Dilaksanakan Dengan Vidcon. Dari website: https://memontum.com/111557-musrenbang-rkpd-kota-malang-tahun-2021-dilaksanakan-dengan-vidcon#ixzz7GVJ1xwGK

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (2012). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. In Universitas Indonesia: UI Press.

Mihelj S, Leguina A and Downey J (2019) Culture is digital: Cultural participation, diversity and the digital divide. New Media & Society 21(7): 1465–1485. DOI:10.1177/1461444818822816.

Mitchell, B. (2005). Participatory partnerships: engaging and empowering to enhance environmental management and quality of life?. Social indicators research, 71, 123-144.

Morrell E, Tuerah N and Sumarto HS (2011) Local authority and pro-poor urban management in Indonesia’s transition to democracy. International Development Planning Review 33(1): 49–66. DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2011.4.

Ningrum, P.A., Hukom, A., and Adiwijaya, S. (2020). The Potential of Poverty in the City of Palangka Raya: Study SMIs Affected Pandemic Covid 19. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (3): 1626-1634.

Phelps NA, Bunnell T, Miller MA, et al. (2014) Urban inter-referencing within and beyond a decentralized Indonesia. Cities 39: 37–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.02.004.

Sihombing, E.H., and Nasib. (2020). The Decision of Choosing Course in the Era of Covid 19 through the Telemarketing Program, Personal Selling and College Image. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (4): 2843-2850.

Tarigan AKM, Samsura DAA, Sagala S, et al. (2017) Medan City: Development and governance under the decentralisation era. Cities 71: 135–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.002.

Todaro, Michael P. and Stephen C. Smith. 2006. Economic Development. Pearson Education. New Jersey.

Yang, K. (2005). Public administrators’ trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65, 273-285.

Yunas NS (2017) Efektivitas E-Musrenbang di Kota Surabaya dalam Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Berparadigma Masyarakat. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 7(1). 1: 19–27. DOI: 10.26618/ojip.v7i1.387.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4032

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 101 times
PDF - 44 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.