Developing Entrance Ticket and Exit Card as Formative Assessment for Promoting Learner Autonomy of Struggling Students

Yogyantoro Yogyantoro

Abstract


Struggling students risk leaving school without having the opportunity to develop their independence to become less reliant on others. This study aims to gain insights into how formative assessment as a teaching design can support self-regulated learning (SRL) among struggling students. Entrance Ticket and Exit Card are short prompts that can provide instructors with a quick student diagnostic. These exercises can be collected on 6”x4” cards or small pieces of paper. Formative assessment is most effective when administered often. Efficiency is ensured when the information identified is evaluated immediately and the results are applied directly in the next lesson. The study was conducted to determine the perceptions of students and experts regarding using entrance tickets and exit cards for promoting students' learning autonomy. This ADDIE research and development study was conducted to develop entrance tickets and exit cards. After the product was created, a quasi-experimental design was used to determine the product's effectiveness toward learner autonomy. The result revealed feasible evaluations from the students and the experts regarding the product. Statistical processes using the independent t-test analysis in comparing the achievement between the control and experimental groups showed significant differences between the groups based on the "Independent Samples Test" output table in the "Equal variances not assumed" row, it is generated that the value of Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.00 <0.05. The experimental group showed above average with overall total mean score of 3.846 level of learner autonomy. The implications of this study extend to teachers, students, and future researchers, providing valuable insights and directions for the advancement and improvement of language education.


Keywords


assessment; entrance tickets; exit cards; learner autonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model Nada. American International Journal of Contemporary Research ADDIE, 5(6), 68–72. https://ph02.tci- thaijo.org/index.php/itm-journal/article/view/240513

Black P. and D. Wiliam (1998), “Assessment and Classroom learning”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, CARFAX, Oxfordshire, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 7-74. ISSN: 0969-594X

Borg W.R. and Gall,MD (1983). Educational research: an introduction. New York: Longman, Inc

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387- 09506-6

Brown, H.D (2004). Language assessment: principles and Classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education

Burke, K. M., Raley, S. K., Shogren, K. A., Hagiwara, M., Mumbardó-Adam, C., Uyanik, H., et al. (2020). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial Spec. Educ. 41, 176–188. doi: 10.1177/0741932518802274

Deborah, J.B. 2010. How to Design Feasibility Studies. London: National Institutes of Health. Am J Prev.

Dr, P. (2008). Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta, Bandung, 25

Drago, C. (2017). Manual de apoyo docente: evaluación para el aprendizaje. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universidad Central de Chile.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fisher, D., and Frey, N. (2004). Improving Adolescent Literacy: Strategies at Work. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Fulcher, Glenn.2003. Testing Second Language Speaking. Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited.

Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. Bin. (2020). Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302

Greenstein, L. (2010). Formative assessment: What teachers really need to know. Virginia, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development [ASCD].

Haryudin, A., & Jamilah, S. A. (2018). Teacher’S Difficulties in Teaching Speaking Using Audio Visual Aid for Autistic Students. ELTIN JOURNAL, Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 6(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v6i2.p107-116

Hamodi, C., López Pastor, VM, & López Pastor, AT (2015). Means, techniques and instruments of formative and shared evaluation of learning in higher education. Educational Profiles, 37 (147), 146-161.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Https://dasint.org.sg/learning-differently/learning-differently-s/struggling-learners

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

Knowles, M. 1975. Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge: Englewood Cliffs.OM

Lagana-Riordan, C., Aguilar, J. P., Franklin, C., Streeter, C. L., Kim, J. S., Tripodi, S. J., &

Hopson, L. M. (2011). At-risk students’ perceptions of traditional schools and a solution- focused public alternative school. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(3), 105–114. http://doi.org/10.1080/10459880903472843

Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.

Marzano, R. (2012). The Many Uses of Exit Slips. Educational Leadership, [online] 70.2:.80-81. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational Leadership/oct12/vol70/num02/The-Many-Uses-of-Exit-Slips.aspx [Accessed 20 December 2015

Marzano, R. (2012). The Many Uses of Exit Slips. Educational Leadership, [online] 70.2:.80-81.

Mitchell, S. (2023). Fostering Autonomy in Japanese Learners. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 4(03), 67–70. UIJRT.COM

Miller, C. J., Smith, S. N., & Pugatch, M. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research. Psychiatry Research, 283(June 2019), 112452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.027

Nagai, N., Birch, G. C., Bower, J. V., & Schmidt, M. G. (2020). CEFR-informed Learning, Teaching and Assessment A Practical Guide. Springer Texts in Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5894-8

Nunan, D. (Ed.). (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill

OECD (2005), Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms, Paris, ISBN: 92-64-00739-3, price: 43 €, 282 p

Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and Reliability Issues in Educational Research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(May), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2012.v2n2.391

Patel, R., Tarrant, C., Bonas, S. et al. (2 more authors) (2015) The struggling student: a thematic analysis from the self-regulated learning perspective. Medical Education, 49 (4). pp. 417-426. ISSN 0308-0110

Ramadhiyah, S., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2019). Exploring EFL learner autonomy in the 2013 Curriculum implementation. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.15626

Raufovich, S. R., & Qizi, Z. P. (2022). Developing The Language Skills. Receptive And Productive Skills Sayfullin. O‘Zbekistonda Fanlararo Innovatsiyalar Va Ilmiy Tadqiqotlar Jurnali, 2(13), 179– 183. https://bestpublication.org/index.php/ozf/article/view/1738

Pasek de Pinto, E., & Mejía, MT (2017). General process for formative assessment of learning. Ibero-American Journal of Educational Evaluation.

Riley, R & Gremmo, M. 1995. Autonomy, self-direction, and self-access in language teaching and learning: the history of an idea. System, 23.2: 151-64.

Science and Children, July 2019, Vol. 56, No. 9, Formative Assessment (July 2019), pp. 28-37

Songbatumis, A. M. (2017). Challenges in Teaching English Faced by English Teachers at MTsN Taliwang, Indonesia. Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.2223

Suriaman, A., Bin-Tahir, S. Z., & Usman, S. (2019). Asian EFL Journal Research Articles. Vol. 23 Issue No. 3.3 May 2019. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 23(3), 28–40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343222181%0ADesigning

Tran, T. B. T., & Vuong, T. K. (2022). Factors Affecting Learner Autonomy in Tertiary Level English Learning: A Study at Van Lang University. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.23311

Tsulaia, N., & Adamia, Z. (2020). Formative assessment tools for higher education learning environment. 3(1), 86-93.

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014

Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F. A., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: A review of research (2011-2019). Language Teaching, 53(4), 491–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000208




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v6i4.7797

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 7 times
PDF - 4 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.