Determinants of Whistleblowing Intention: Perceived Organizational Support as Moderating Variable

Septiana Dwi Lestari, Siti Mutmainah


Fraud is a global problem that affects all organizations around the world. The results of the ACFE Indonesia survey show that in Indonesia fraud the most common fraud is through the whistleblowing. There are several factors that influence someone to do whistleblowing. This study aims to prove the effect of attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and perceived authentic leadership on whistleblowing and to examine the role of perceived organizational support in moderating these interactions. The sample used is ASN in the Tegal District Government. This study uses purposive sampling for the selection of respondents. The type of data used in this study is primary data. Based on the questionnaire distribution process, the number of samples was 211 respondents. Furthermore, testing the hypothesis in this study using the software WarpPLS 7.0 The results show that attitudes, subjective norms and perceived authentic leadership have a positive effect on intention internal whistleblowing. Meanwhile, perceived behavioral control has no effect on internal whistleblowing. Perceived organizational support can weaken the influence of attitudes and subjective norms on intention internal whistleblowing and cannot moderate perceived behavioral control and perceived authentic leadership of intention internal whistleblowing.


attitude; subjective norms; perceived behavioral control; perceived authentic leadership, perceived organizational support

Full Text:



ACFE.,2020. Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Online. Global Fraud Study: Report-to-the-Nations.pdf

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Alleyne, P. (2016). The influence of organisational commitment and corporate ethical values on non-public accountants' whistle-blowing intentions in Barbados. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(2), 190–210.

Alleyne, P., Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2019). Does group cohesion moderate auditors' whistleblowing intentions? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 34, 69–90.

Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Pike, R. (2013). Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. British Accounting Review, 45(1), 10–23.

Angelia, N. (2020). Analysis of Community Institution Empowerment as a Village Government Partner in the Participative Development Process. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (2): 1352-1359.

Anugerah, R., Abdillah, MR, & Anita, R. (2019). Authentic leadership and internal whistleblowing intention: The mediating role of psychological safety. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 556–567.

Bhal, KT, & Dadhich, A. (2011). Impact of Ethical Leadership and Leader-Member Exchange on Whistle Blowing: The Moderating Impact of the Moral Intensity of the Issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 485–496.

Caillier, JG (2017). An examination of the role whistle-blowing education plays in the whistle-blowing process. Social Science Journal, 54(1), 4–12.

Cho, YJ, & Song, HJ (2015). Determinants of Whistleblowing Within Government Agencies.

Dalton, D., & Radtke, RR (2013). The Joint Effects of Machiavellianism and Ethical Environment on Whistle-Blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 153–172.

Elliston, FA (1982). Anonymity and whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(3), 167–177.

Hays, JB (2013). an Investigation of the Motivation of Management Accountants To Report Fraudulent Accounting Activity :

Huda, Mi'rojul, YNS (2013). Jurnal ilmu pemerintahan. 1(1), 1–9.

Kyei-Poku, I., & Yang, Y. (Jason). (2020). Authentic leadership and citizenship behavior: A path through fairness and belongingness. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 23(3), 245–258.

Latan, H., Ringle, CM, & Jabbour, CJC (2016). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 573–588.

Lewis, D. (2011). Whistleblowing in a changing legal climate: Is it time to revisit our approach to trust and loyalty at the workplace? Business Ethics, 20(1), 71–87.

Liu, S. min, Liao, J. qiao, & Wei, H. (2015). Authentic Leadership and Whistleblowing: Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Personal Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 107–119.

Miceli, MP, & Near, JP (1988). Individual and Situational Correlates of Whistle‐Blowing. Personnel Psychology, 41(2), 267–281.

Mustafida, N. (2020). Determinants of Employee Whistleblowing Intentions in Indonesia: Applying Theory of Planned Behavior. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 23(02), 241–262.

Owusu, GMY, Bekoe, RA, Anokye, FK, & Okoe, FO (2020). Whistleblowing intentions of accounting students: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(2), 477–492.

Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2009). Whistleblowing as planned behavior - A survey of south korean police officers. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 545–556.

Pillay, S., Ramphul, N., Dorasamy, N., & Meyer, D. (2015). Predictors of Whistle- Blowing Intentions : An Analysis of Multi-Level Variables.

Pulungan, AH, Jenitha, K., Tirtaning, A., Maharsi, S., Program, AS, Sampoerna, U., & Mulya, UP (2021). Authentic leadership and whistleblowing: the mediating roles of trust and moral courage. 5(2), 265–289.

Rothschild, J., & Miethe, TD (1999). Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organization corruption. Work and Occupations, 26(1), 107–128.

Safira, E., & Ilmi, MB (2020). Pengaruh Sikap, Persepsi Kontrol Perilaku, Tanggung Jawab Pribadi dan Keseriusan yang Dirasakan terhadap Niat Whistleblowing. Reviuw Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 4(2), 83–98.

Sarikhani, M., & Ebrahimi, F. (2021). Whistleblowing by accountants: an integration of the fraud pentagon and the extended theory of planned behavior. Meditari Accountancy Research.

Saud, IM (2016). Pengaruh Sikap dan Persepsi Kontrol Perilaku Terhadap Niat Whistleblowing Internal-Eksternal dengan Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. 17(2), 209–219.

Survana, L. (2021). Pengaruh Authentic Leadership, Retaliation Dimediasi Pcychological Safety Terhadap Internal Intensi Melakukan Whistleblowing. Skripsi.

Suryono, E., & Chariri, A. (2016). Sikap, Norma Subjektif, Dan Intensi Pegawai Negeri Sipil Untuk Mengadukan Pelanggaran (Whistle-Blowing). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(1), 102–116.

Tuan Mansor, TM, Mohamad Ariff, A., & Hashim, HA (2020). Whistleblowing by auditors: the role of professional commitment and independence commitment. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(8), 1033–1055.

Tudu, PN (2020). Blow whistle, should I or shouldn't I: a study on moderating effect of perceived organizational support on intention to blow the whistle among Indian Government employees. Society and Business Review, 16(2), 218–237.

Walumbwa, FO, Avolio, BJ, Gardner, WL, Wernsing, TS, & Peterson, SJ (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.

Wiranita, I. (2019). Pengaruh Sikap, Norma SUbjektif, dan Persepsi Kontrol Perilaku Terhadap Niat Whistleblowing dengan Dukungan Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi.

Yuswono, TA, & Hartijasti, Y. (2018). Employees ' Whistleblowing Intention in Public Sector : The Role of Perceived Organizational Support as Moderating Variable. 19(2).


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 82 times
PDF - 17 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.