Analysis of the Legal Implications for the Parties Based on the Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell Where There Is a Person Who IsB-Ed

Putri Briliantini Ananiar, Aisyah Nur Prayekti

Abstract


There is a Decision Number 3519 K/Pdt/2017 which is an appeal against the Decision of the Banda Aceh High Court numbered 43/PDT/2017/PT. The BNA, which in essence the panel of judges in the high court ruled that the Notary as defendant II was also decided by the Panel of Judges to be responsible and to be compensated along with the other defendants for the making of a Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell based on the testimony of the pretended Person. The person pretending to be someone authorized to be an obstacle in the deed, by carrying a fake Identity Card. The purpose of this study is to analyze the Legal Implications for the Parties Based on the Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell Where There Are People who pretend, through a normative juridical approach, namely regulations based on applicable laws and regulations. The results of the study provide an explanation of the decision of Cassation Number 3519 K / Pdt / 2017 which corroborates that this Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell is null and void. Thus, the aforesaid deed of power of attorney is no longer binding on the parties therein, all the powers and rights and obligations born out of the aforementioned grant of power are considered to have never existed and are binding on the parties (the person who claimed to be Z. Ahmad Nyak Cut and defendant I). in addition, there are other legal implications for the creation of a deed of power of attorney for sale in which there is a person who pretends, then according to one of the parties to the agreement, may apply for cancellation if it is found that the incompetence of the parties to the agreement.

 


Keywords


legal implications; powers act; pretended persons.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Pitlo. (1978). Pembuktian dan Daluwarsa Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Belanda, (Intermassa),

Ana Silviana, R. Suharto, Safira Dini Laksita. (2017). ‘Legalitas Kuasa dalam Akta Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah sebagai Dasar Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli (Studi di Kota Semarang)’ 6 Diponegoro Law Review

Cicilia R. S. L. Tirajoh. (2015).‘Kajian Yuridis Pelanggaran Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Jo. Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014.’ 2. Lex Privatum 3

Effendi Perangin. (199). Praktek Jual Beli Tanah, (PT Raja Grafindo Persada)

Effendi Perangin. (1994). Praktek Jual Beli Tanah, (PT Raja Grafindo Persada)

Habib Adjie. (2009). Meneropong Khazanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia : Kumpulan Tulisan tentang Notaris dan PPAT, (Citra Aditya)

Habib Adjie. (2008).Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, (PT. Refika Aditama),

J. Satrio. (1992). Hukum Perjanjian, (PT. Citra Aditya Bakti)

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek), diterjemahkan oleh R. Subekti, (PT. Pradya Paramita, 2009), Ps. 1331

Sjaifurrachman. (2011).Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, (Mandar Maju)

Sri Mamudji, et. al. (2005). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, (Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia)

Undang-Undang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, UU No. 2 Tahun 2014, (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 3).

Urip Santoso, Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, Cet. 2, Ed. 1, (Kencana, 2011)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6361

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 22 times
PDF - 9 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.