South Korea's Interests in THAAD Development Cooperation with the United States

Maulidiyah Dewi Sejati, Indrawati Indrawati

Abstract


Security is one of the main focuses of countries in the world. In achieving this, many countries cooperate or join alliances. South Korea has long joined the United States alliance because North Korea has weapons of destruction, which is the biggest threat to South Korea. One of the commitments the United States gives to its allies is to protect defence and security. When North Korea conducted its fourth nuclear test in January 2016, South Korea and the United States worked together to build the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in Seongju, South Korea. This research analyzes what interests South Korea wants to achieve in security cooperation with the United States. The theory of national interest and the concept of security dilemma is used to answer this problem. This research was arranged systematically using qualitative research methods. The research results show that South Korea's interests in THAAD development cooperation with the United States include 1)strengthening alliances with the United States, 2)North Korea's fourth nuclear test, which led to an imbalance of military power, and 3)the emergence of China as a threat to South Korea.


Keywords


security dilemma; national interest; THAAD

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, F. R. (2020). Aliansi Militer Korea Selatan Dengan Amerika Serikat Dalam Melakukan Strategic Alliance Untuk Menjaga Stabilitas Keamanan Semenanjung Korea Tahun 2015-2016. Yogyakarta : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta .

Army Technology . (2017). THAAD Terminal High Altitude Area Defense. United States of America: Army Technology United States of America.

BBC News. (2017). Amerika Serikat Uji Perisai Rudal Untuk Lawan Ancaman Korea Utara . Indonesia: BBC News.

BBC News. (2016). Seberapa Nyata Ancaman Bom Nuklir Korea Utara? Jakarta: BBC News .

Christensen, T. J. (2012). More Actors, Less Coordination? New Challenges for the Leaders of a Rising China. Palgrave Macmillan , 22-37.

CNN Indonesia . (2021). Satu Dekade Kim Jong-un, Nuklir Masih Jadi Tongkat Sihir Andalan Korut. Jakarta : CNN Indonesia .

Edmunds, T., Gaskarth, J., & Porter, R. (2014). Introduction British Foreign Policy and the National Interest. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Elleman, M., & Zagurer Jr, M. J. (2016). THAAD: What It Can and Can’t Do. Washington DC: 38 North .

Esook, Y. (2007). Russian Foreign Policy and South Korean Security. Praeger Security International , 136-154.

Habiburahman, & Pazli. (2017). Penentangan Tiongkok Terhadap Korea Selatan Dalam Pengadaan Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) di Korea Selatan Tahun 2016. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Universitas Riau , 1-15.

Han, J. J., & Chen, Y. C. (2017). A Study on the Economic Losses and Countermeasures between Korea and China. Issues and Challenges , 10-17.

Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics Vol 2, No 2 , 157.

Institute for Security and Development Policy. (2017). THAAD on the Korean Peninsula. Institute for Security & Development Policy – www.isdp.eu.

Jangho, K., Daewon, O., Jaejok, P., & Mason, R. (2020). To Double Down or Decouple? North Korea and China as Challenges to the U.S.-South Korea Alliance. Asian Politics Policy , 40-56.

Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, Vol 30, No 2 , 167-214.

Judson, J. (2016). THAAD to Officially Deploy to South Korea. Virginia: Defense News.

Kiyoung, C., & Choongkoo, L. (2018). North Korea and the East Asian Security Order: Competing Views on What South Korea Ought to do. The Pacific Review , 245-255.

Kyudok, H. (2016). A South Korean Perspective on Dealing with North Korean Provocations : Challenges and Opportunities. Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies , 205-2018.

Lake, A. (1981). Defining the National Interest. The Academy of Political Science , 202-213.

Leofarhan, & Azzqy, A. A. (2018). Kerjasama Militer Korea Selatan dan Amerika Serikat Dalam Penempatan THAAD Sebagai Respon Atas Uji Coba Misil Balistik Korea Utara Periode 2013-2017. Balcony : Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy , 103-114.

Liff, A., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2014). Racing Toward Tragedy? China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security , 52-91.

Manyin, E. M. (2016). United States-South Korea Relations . Congressional Research Service , 4.

Michael, R. (2020). Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD). New York: Salem Press Encyclopedia of Science.

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif . Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1952). Another Great Debate: The National Interest of the United States. The American Political Science Review , 961-988.

National Research Council. (2012). Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense : An Assesment of Concepts and Systems for US Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

Neuchterlein, D. E. (1976). National Interests and Foreign Policy: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis and Decision Making. British Journal of International Studies , 246-266.

Nincic, M. (1999). The National Interest and its Interpretation. The Review of Politics, Volume 61, Issue 1 , 29-55.

Plano, J. C. (1982). The International Dictionary . Inggris : Clio Press ltd.

Purwono, A., & Zuhri, A. S. (2010). Peran Nuklir Korea Utara Sebagai Instrumen Diplomasi Korea Utara . Spektrum : Jurnal Ilmu Politik Hubungan International , 1-20.

Rinna, A. V. (2018). Russia's Strategic Partnerships with China and South Korea : The Impact of THAAD. Asia Policy , 79-99.

Roza, R. (2013). ual Use Teknologi Jepang dan Kepentingan Keamanan Nasional AS. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta , 107-122.

Satris, R. (2015). Peningkatan Anggaran Persenjataan Militer China Sebagai Bagian dari Security Dilemma di Kawasan Asia Pasifik. The Politics : Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin , 95-104.

Seung-Yoon, Y., & Mochtar, M. (2004). Politik Luar Negeri Korea Selatan : Penyesuaian Diri Terhadap Masyarakat Internasional. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.

Shah, M. M., et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 3, No 1, Page: 276-286.

Sindo News. (2017). Data Uji Coba Nuklir Korea Utara dari Masa ke Masa . Jakarta: Sindo News.

Sugiyono. (2014 ). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods) . Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&D . Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sukjoon, Y. (2018). Stopping North Korean Missiles: An Alternative to THAAD. Texas: The Diplomat.

Sunwoo, L., & Hyungjin, C. (2018). A Subtle Difference Between Russia and China’s Stances Toward the Korean Peninsula and Its Strategic Implications for South Korea. Jurnal of International and Area Studies , 113-130.

Thalib, H. H. (2015). Kebijakan Pertahanan Keamanan Korea Selatan dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Nuklir Korea Utara Tahun 2002-2012 . Diskusi Ilmiah Komunitas Hubungan International Universitas Udayana , 1-15.

VOA Indonesia. (2006). 2006 Catat Kemajuan Program Nuklir Korea Utara. Jakarta: VOA Indonesia .

Walt, S. M. (2014). Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. England: Routledge.

Weldes, J. (1999). Constructing National Interests : The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. University of Minnesota Press.

Youngshik, D. B. (2016). The U.S.-South Korea Alliance: Local, Regional and Global Dimensions. Asian Politics and Policy , 39-49.

Zhou, S. (2017). American Reflections on the Engagement with China and Responses to President Xi’s New Model of Major Power Relation. Journal of Contemporary , 489-503.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6314

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 63 times
PDF - 26 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.