A Study on the Maturity of Risk Management using the RIMS Risk Maturity Model® Approach in Investigating Activities at Law Enforcement Agencies for Corruption

Dedy Simanungkalit, Agustinus Nicholas L. Tobing

Abstract


This study aims to analyze how to use the RIMS risk maturity model to evaluate the implementation of risk management in a law enforcement agency in Indonesia in investigating corruption and the gap between the existing implementation and the ideal conditions as suggested in the RIMS Risk Maturity Model. This descriptive qualitative research with a case study approach obtained data from external sources of the organization in the form of literature data and internal sources of the organization in direct observations, document analysis, and interviews with related parties within the organization. This research provides a tool for organizations, particularly organizations similar to the object of this research, to assess how to implement risk management processes by following general best practices. The maturity assessment results show that the risk management maturity level in the XYZ agency is in the Tier-2 position, and there is still a large gap between the current condition and the target maturity level. The XYZ agency should immediately start integrating risk management into all business processes and performance management to improve its risk management maturity level.


Keywords


law enforcement, RIMS risk maturity model, public sector

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alijoyo, A. (2017, April 6). Pertahanan 3 Lapis (The 3 lines of defence) – Konteks ERM Perusahaan Publik Di Indonesia. Retrieved August 2, 2021, from Website Kompasiana Beyond Blogging: https://www.kompasiana.com/crmsindonesia/pertahanan-3-lapis-the-3-lines-of-defence-konteks-erm-perusahaan-publik-di-indnesia?page=all

Coetzee, G. P., & Lubbe, D. (2013). The risk maturity of South African private and public sector organizations. Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research, 14, 45-56.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design Quantitative & Qualitative Approach. London: Sage Publication.

Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management (5th ed.). The Institute of Risk Management.

Indrayana, D. (2016). Jangan Bunuh KPK - Kajian Hukum Tata Negara Penguatan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Revisi ed.). Malang: Intrans Publishing.

Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2012, Juni). Managing Risks: A New Framework. Retrieved from Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/2012/06/managing-risks-a-new-framework

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. (n.d.).

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2019). Peraturan Pimpinan KPK RI Nomor 9 tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Manajemen Risiko.

Levy, C., Lamarre, E., & Twining, J. (2010). McKinsey Working Paper On Risk: Taking Control of Organizational Risk Culture. McKinsey&Company.

Minsky, S. (2021). ERM Program Audit Guide: Risk Maturity Model, Assessing the Adequacy and Effectiveness of Risk Management. LogicManager.

Munawar, Y., & Aini, R. F. (2020). Ketidakpastian, Risiko, Masalah, Krisis, dan Bencana. Retrieved January 23, 2022, from Website LSP MKS: https://lspmks.co.id/2020/08/07/ketidakpastian-risiko-masalah-krisis-dan-bencana/

Muttaqin, L., & Susanto, M. E. (2018). Mengkaji Serangan Balik Koruptor Terhadap KPK dan Strategi Menghadapinya. INTEGRITAS Volume 4 Nomor 1 - Juni 2018.

Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The Effect of Training on Work Performance and Career Development: The Role of Motivation as Intervening Variable. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 2385–2393. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1940

Proenca, D., Estevens, J., Vieira, R., & Borbinha, J. (2017). Risk Management: A Maturity Model based on ISO 31000. IEEE Computer Society, 99-108. doi:10.1109/CBI.2017.40

RIMS, Risk and Insurance Management Society Inc. (2006). RIMS Risk Maturity Model (RMM) for Enterprise Risk Management: Executive Summary. Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. Retrieved from Website of The Risk Management Society.

Sawyer, L. B. (2018). Sawyer's Internal Auditing: Enhancing and Protecting Organizational Value (7th ed.). The Institute of Internal Auditors.

SCCE & HACCA, S. H. (2020). Compliance Risk Management: Applying The COSO ERM Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Suharso. (2016). Pilihan Standar Manajemen Risiko di Indonesia. Retrieved January 25, 2022, from www.klikharso.com.

The Institute of Internal Auditor. (2017). Standards Glossary. Retrieved January 23, 2022, from Website IIA North America: https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/mandatory-guidance/pages/standards-glossary.aspx

The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2016). International Standards For The Professional Practice Of Internal Auditing (STANDARDS). Florida, USA.

The Risk Management Society. (2022). RIMS Risk Maturity Model. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from Website of RIMS - The Risk Management Society: https://www.rims.org/Tools/risk-maturity-model

Tuanakotta, T. (2019). Audit Internal Berbasis Risiko. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (2019).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU Tipikor) oleh Pemerintah. (2001).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (2002).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (1999).

Vorst, C. R., Priyarsono, D., & Budiman, A. (2018). Manajemen Risiko Berbasis SNI ISO 31000. Jakarta Pusat: Badan Standardisasi Nasional.

Wahyuni, S. (2015). Qualitative Research Method: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Method (6th ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5377

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 53 times
PDF - 21 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.