The Presupposition Usage in Disney Zombies 2: Pragmatic Study
Abstract
This research aims to find the presupposition types and analyze the purpose of speaker's utterances found in Disney Zombies 2. Presupposition is something assumed or presupposed to be true in a sentence or utterance which asserts other information. Based on Yule (1996: 28) presupposition is classified by six types, namely existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counterfactual. Qualitative method was used by the writer in analyzing the data. Then, the data were taken from every character’s utterance which contains presupposition in Disney Zombie 2. From the results of the analysis, it was discovered all types of presupposition and the most dominant presupposition type is used by the characters was existential presupposition includes 4 utterances of existential (33%), 2 utterances of factive (17%), 1 utterance of lexical (8%), 2 utterances of structural (17%), 1 utterance of non-factive (8%), and 2 utterances of counterfactual presupposition (17%). Then, the speaker purposed that he/she wants to tell the listener the information which becomes exist and to be true (Existential), to show the listener the information which is conveyed is a fact (Factive), to convey the unstated meaning to the listener (Lexical), to know the truth of the missing information (Structural), to show the falsity condition of a case (Non-Factive), to show the opposite from the actual condition (counterfactual).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Hasbullah, et al. (2018). Communication Pattern of Wilayatul Hisbah, Lhokseumawe City in Implementing Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal).P. 194-205.
Hudson, G. (2000). Essential Introductory Linguistics. Michigan: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Leech, Geoffrey. (1983). The Principle of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, C. Stephen. (1993). Pragmatics. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Louis, A. (1958). Management and Organization.New York : McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nistiti, N., U.(2021). Philosophy of Language: Pragmatic Presupposition in Motivational Speech within Discourse and Its Relevance of Motivation in Teaching Learning Process to Reach Goals. Prosodi. doi: https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v15i2.12185
Paradieta, A.M. (2014). Presuppoistion in The Movie Pitch Perfect. Lexicon,3(3), 113-124. doi : 10.22146/lexicon.v3i2.42109
Ramadhan, A. (2008). An Analysis of Students’ Ability and Difficulties in Public Speaking at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. Retrieved from https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/5870-Full_Text.pdf
Simatupang, E. C., & Fathonah, P. N. (2020). Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis in Joko Widodo’s Inauguration Speech in 2019. English Journal Literacy Utama, 3(2) 309-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol5.iss1.2020.482
Thoyyibah, L. (2017). Presupposition Triggers: A Comparative Analysis between Oral News and Written Online News Discourse. JALL: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v1i2.1733
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Zakrimal & A'la, S. D. (2020). An Analysis of Presupposition in “Ouija”: Origin of Evil Movie”: Pragmatics Approach. Scientia Jounal, 2(2) Retrieved from https://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/scientia_journal/issue/view/157
Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5247
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 124 timesPDF - 45 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.