Cultural Communication of Sedekah Bumi (Earth Alms) Rituals of Poggang Village Community Serangpanjang Subang during Covid-19 Pandemic

Dwinarko Dwinarko, Annisa Eka Syafrina, Tabrani Sjafrizal

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the cultural communication of sedekah bumi (earth alms) ritual in Ponggang Village community in preserving cultural values and ancestral heritage during pandemic. The theory used is Schutz's theory of communicative action that the idea of contextualization with communicative action can be developed by describing three elements of theory, namely an Action in the form of Social action, oriented to the participants present, from mediated action, which expands action into a secondary manipulator. Then, Transcendence about widely ignored categorical differences and Objectivation which deals textual differences. The method used is a descriptive qualitative narrative from direct observations, interviews, and involvement in cultural rituals by mingling with the community before and after the ritual procession. The results of the research show the Earth Alms Ritual is a communicative action through traditional meetings, preparation with mutual assistance costs, facilities and infrastructure with the active participation of traditional leaders and indigenous peoples through the division of tasks as a form of social interaction. Communicative actions are reflected through cultural meanings in various symbols or communication symbols integrated into the meaning of agricultural products, exchange of taste, intention, slaughtering goats, suro porridge, and ritual processions meaning religious values building a fertile natural environment. The pandemic atmosphere reflects the community's life to carry out ritual communicative actions to become a cultural horizon in maintaining the health and welfare of the community. Recommendations, integration of knowledge on preserving ritual culture as part of individual and community introspection actions in preventing Covid-19.


Keywords


culture; communication; ritual; sedekah bumi (earth alms)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldo Di Luzio, Susanne Gunthner and Franca Orletti. 2001. Culture in Communication Analyses of intercultural situations by John Benjamins. B.V. Publisher. North America. P.O. Box 27519. Philadelphia PA 19118-0519. USA. Pragmatics & beyond, ISSN 0922-842X

Andrew Dainty, David Moore and Michael Murray. 2006. Communication in Construction Theory and practice. First published by Taylor & Francis 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada.

Bara, A., et.al. (2021). The Effectiveness of Advertising Marketing in Print Media during the Covid 19 Pandemic in the Mandailing Natal Region. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 4 (1): 879-886.

Biswarup Sen. 2016. Information as Ritual: James Carey in the Digital Age. Cultural Studies. Critical Methodologies1–9. Sage Publications Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/ journals Permissions. Nav. DOI: 10.1177/1532708615625687csc.sagepub.com

David Holmes. 2005. Communication Theory Media, Technology, Society. SAGE Publications Inc.2455. Teller Road Thousand Oaks. California.

Dickson Adom, Akwasi Yeboah, Attah Kusi Ankrah. 2016. Constructivism Philosophical Paradigm: Implication for Research, Teaching and Learning. Ghana. Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences Vol. 4, No.10, halaman.1-9.

Fazal Rahim Khan, Zafar Iqbal, Osman B. Gazzaz. 2012. Communication and Culture: Reflections on the Perspectives of Influence. office@wulfeniajournal.at Vol.19, No. 8.

Jaqueline Brinn. 2015. Ritual Communication in Relationships mediated through ICT. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4330.6407.

Jochen Dreher. The Social Construction of Power: Reflections beyond Berger/Luckmann and Bourdieu. Erschienen in: Cultural Sociology; 10 (2016), 1. - S. 53-68 https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1749975515615623

John R. Baldwin, Sandra L. Faulkner. Michael L. Hecht. Sheryl L. Lindsley. 2006. Redefining Culture Perspectives across the Disciplines. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Mahwah, New Jersey London.

Maureen Guirdham. 2005. Communicating Across Cultures at Work. Second Edition. Published by Palgrave Macmillan Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010

Ningrum, P.A., Hukom, A., and Adiwijaya, S. (2020). The Potential of Poverty in the City of Palangka Raya: Study SMIs Affected Pandemic Covid 19. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (3): 1626-1634.

O’Sullivan, John Hartley, Danny Saunders, Martin Montgomery and John Fiske 2006. Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies. Second Edition. Second edition first published by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London. Taylor & Francis e-Library. ISBN 0-203-13637-3 Master e-book ISBN.

Philippe J. Maarek and Gadi Wolfsfeld. 2003. Political Communication in a New Era. A cross-national perspective. First published by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London.

Qing Lan. 2018. Does ritual exist? Defining and classifyingritual based on belief theory. The Journal of Chinese Sociology (2018) 5:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-018-0073-x.

Sihombing, E.H., and Nasib. (2020). The Decision of Choosing Course in the Era of Covid 19 through the Telemarketing Program, Personal Selling and College Image. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (4): 2843-2850.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4336

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 100 times
PDF - 49 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.