_.gif)
_.gif)
Legal Analysis of Criminal Child with Mental Retardation (Study of Rantauprapat State Court Decision No. 18/PID.SUS/ANAK/2016/PN-RAP)
Abstract
The perpetrators of criminal acts today are not only dominated by adults, but children also have a great potential to commit criminal acts, even children who are abnormal or mentally retarded can commit crimes as known in the Rantauprapat District Court Decision Number: 18/Pid.Sus-Child. /2016/PN-Rap. This research was conducted normatively by discussing doctrines or principles as well as legal synchronization using the approach to legislation. This means that the principles and synchronization of law are used as benchmarks to provide an assessment of the judge's considerations on the sentencing of children with mental retardation in the Rantauprapat District Court Decision Number: 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN-Rap. In Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it is very possible to apply non-penal policies through diversionary restorative justice instruments but this is not done, the judge's policy in providing legal protection to children with mental retardation is carried out through penal policies in the form of criminal imprisonment for 2 (two) years and 7 (seven) months and a fine of Rp. 100,000,000, - (one hundred million rupiah), provided that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with work training for 3 (three) months.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali Zainuddin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014.
Azhar, A. (2018). Students’ Trends in Islamic Communication Postgraduate in2010-2016 State Islamic University of North Sumatera (UINSU). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), P.206-214.
Davison Gerald C., dkk, Psikologi Abnormal, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Edisi Ke-9, Jakarta 2014.
E.Y. Kanter dan S.R. Sianturi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Penerapannya, Stroria Grafika, Jakarta, 2002.
Ediwarman, Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam Prespektif Kriminologi, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta. 2014.
Hamzah Andi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia & Perkembangannya, PT. Sofmedia, 2012.
HS Salim, Pengantar Hukum Pedata Tertulis (BW), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta 2003.
Huda Chairul, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Kencana, Jakarta 2006.
Johan Bahder, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2008.
Kitap Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Lamintang P.A.F., Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.
Lilik Mulyadi, Pengadilan Anak di Indonesia, Teori, Praktek Dan Permasalahannya, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2005.
__________, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana, Perspektif, Teoritis Dan Praktik, Alumni. 2008.
Marpaung Leden, Asas-Teori- Praktek Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Nawawi Arif Barda, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru, Kencana, Jakarta, 2014.
O.S. Hiariej Eddy, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat Nomor : 18/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN-Rap
Soekanto Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta, 1984.
Soesilo R., Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politea Bogor, 1996.
Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Udang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak
Wiyono R., Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4263
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 21 timesPDF - 15 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.