_.gif)
_.gif)
PDI Struggle Party School: Strengthening Political Party Institutions and Increasing the Quality of Party Cadres
Abstract
The party school is the PDI-P's answer to the defeat of the 2004 general election. Through the party school, the consolidation of cadres is carried out intensely so that every candidate for the party leadership council, regional head and deputy regional head, and members of the legislature is required to attend party schools. The institutionalization of political parties through party schools was carried out simultaneously with the affirmation of the political position of the PDI-P, successively as: the Ideological Party based on Pancasila in 2005; affirmation of party management is identical to managing the state in 2010, and PDI-P as the Pioneer Party in 2015 and 2019. The purposes of this paper are to: 1. analyze the significance of party schools in improving the quality of party cadres. 2 to explain the influence of party schools on party institutionalization and the development of party identity and identity on the basis of party ideology, culture and identity. 3. Explain the influence of party schools in suppressing the tendency to personalize leadership within the party.This writing method uses a qualitative descriptive approach and the writing of this paper uses the literature review method (library research). Through this literature review, it was found that the party school was part of the cadre system built by the PDI-P to forge its cadres to become the best candidate leaders for the community. Party schools involve three party pillars, namely structural, legislative, and executive cadres.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustino, L. (2021). Sistem kepartaian dan Pemilu (2nd Ed.). Universitas Terbuka. Aldrich, J. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Austin, K. ., & Nelson, J. . . (1991). No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries. Harvard University Press.
Ball, R. A. (2011). Modern Politics and Government. Macmillan Education.
Budiatri, A. P. (2018). Personalisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia Era Reformasi. In A. P. Budiatri (Ed.), Personalisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia Era Reformasi (pp. 1–52). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Burke, E. (2002). Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents, 1770. In S. E. Scarrow (Ed.), Perspectives on Political Parties (pp. 37–48). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107403_4
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press. Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political Parties and Democratic
Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Dalton, R. J., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2000). Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press.
Ditpolkom, D. P. dan K. (2016). Laporan Akhir Tinjauan Peran Partai Politik dalam Demokrasi di Indonesia.
Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organisation and Activity in the Modern State. Methuen.
Easton, D. (1968). Political Socialization in International Encyclopedia of the Social Science. Free Press.
Ekawati, E., & Sweinstani, M. K. D. (2020). Dampak Personalisasi Partai terhadap Demokrasi Internal Partai di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 5(2), 111–123.
Faisol, A., Sunarlan, & Krisnadi, I. (2015). Konflik Internal PDI Perjuangan Tahun 2005-2009. Publik Budaya, 1(3), 1–9.
Harmel, R., Svåsand, L. G., & Mjelde, H. (2019). Party Institutionalisation: Concepts and Indicators. In R. Harmel & L. G. Svåsand (Eds.), Institutionalisation of Political Parties: Comparative Cases (pp. 9–24). Rowman & Littlefield International.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale University Press. Hyman, C. (1956). The Study of Politics. University of Illinois Press.
Janda, K. (1980). Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. Free Press.
Latif, Y. (2015). Investasi Ideologis sebagai Daya Hidup PDI Perjuangan. In I. Hasibuan & D. Y. Sitorus (Eds.), Gerak Sejarah Partai Banteng: PNI, PDI, PDI Perjuangan (pp. xxi–xxviii). DPP PDI Perjuangan & Q Communication.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. John Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (2000). The Indispensability of Political Parties. Journal of Democracy, 11(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2000.0016
Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. R. (1995). Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America (M. Scott & T. R. Scully (eds.)). Stanford University Press.
Mietzner, M. (2012). Ideology, Money and Dynastic Leadership: the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, 1998 - 2012. South East Asia Research, 24(2009), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2012.0123
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge University Press.
Randall, V., & Svåsand, L. (2002). Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068802008001001
Romli, L., Perdana, A., Ichwanuddin, W., & Sabri, M. N. (2008). Kerangka Penguatan Partai Politik di Indonesia (S. Hidayat (ed.)). Puskapol Fisip UI.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party Government. Rinehart.
Soltau, R. H. (1961). An Introduction to Politics. Longsman, Green & Co. Sparringa, D. (2012). Kata Pengantar: Partai Politik dan Transisi Demokrasi. In T.
Mayer (Ed.), Peran Partai Politik dalam Sebuah Sistem Demokrasi: Sembilan Tesis (3th ed., pp. 9–14). Friederich Ebert Stiftung FES.
Stokes, S. C. (1999). Political Parties and Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.243
Ware, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford University Press.
Shah, M. et al. (2020). The Development Impact of PT. Medco E & P Malaka on Economic Aspects in East Aceh Regency. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 276-286.
Anggrainy, F. C. (2021, December 28). Survei Parpol SMRC: PDIP 25, 2%, Golkar 11,2%, Gerindra 10,8%. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5873939/survei-parpol- smrc-pdip-252-golkar-112-gerindra-108
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4161
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 88 timesPDF - 32 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.