Government Culture in Public Services Based On Electronic Government in DKI Jakarta Province
Abstract
The implementation of the E-Government system is also driven by a situation that requires the government to reduce waste in financing/expenditures, increase efficiency, meet community expectations, and facilitate economic development. The use of internet technology in government can reduce interactions and direct human-to-human transactions, especially between the state apparatus as service providers and the public as service recipients. Reducing face-to-face interactions means reducing the potential for abuse of authority, such as corrupt and collusive practices. The results of the study indicate that the Smart City program includes the application of E-Government in public services or an integrated citizen administration service system to improve service quality so that citizens can enjoy faster, easier service and the citizen data base can be maintained and updated on an ongoing basis. The Electronic-Based Government System is also included in the list of Regional Strategic Activities (KSD) in 2020. Regional Strategic Activities, hereinafter abbreviated as KSD, are activities that have a strategic nature and/or other activities that have a significant impact on meeting basic needs, accelerating economic growth, and increasing economic growth public welfare. The conclusion is that DKI Jakarta province still adheres to the bureaucratic paradigm (conventional culture). The orientation is still on production cost-efficiency so that service time is still limited to office hours, not yet 24 hours x 7 days. Process Organization still uses functional approach, departmentalization, and control hierarchy. The management principle is still oriented to rule and mandate so that staff and unit leaders do not dare to take a breakthrough for service improvement. This management principle is related to the leadership style which is still command and control so that the space for creativity and innovation becomes narrow. The communication developed has begun to adopt digital era communication by providing a number of communication channels, but it has not been directly connected to the service website. Service delivery for services handled only by PTSP has adopted ICT, but services that involve other OPDs, some of which are still under the conventional paradigm, require applicants to submit physical documents.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amin, M. et al. (2019). Marketing Communication Strategy to Improve Tourism Potential. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 160-166.
Anderson, Dennis, Robert Wu, June-Suh Cho, Katja Schroeder, 2015, E- Government Strategy, ICT and Innovation for Citizen Engagement, New York: Springer.
Bell, David, Brian D.Loader, Nicholas Pleace, and Douglas Schuler, 2004, Cyberculture the Key Concepts, New York: Routledge.
Blakemore, Michael, Neil Mc Donald, Nicola Hall, and Rasa Fucuite, 2010, “Delivering Citizen-Centric Public Services Through Technology- Facilitated Organisasional Change”, dalam Paul G. Nixon, Vassiliki N.Koutrakou, and Rajash Rawal, (editor), Understanding E-Government in Europe Issues and Challenges, New York: Routledge.
Budiardjo, Miriam, 2010, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Cheema, G. Shabbir and Dennis A. Rondinelli, 2007, Decentralizing Governance, Emerging Concepts and Practices, 2007, Washington: Harvard University.
Cheema, G. Shabbir and Vesselin Popovski, 2010, Building Trust in Government, Innovations in Governance Reform in Asia, , New York: United Nations University.
Delza Abdul Hafizh, Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Studi Deskriptif tentang Penerapan Layanan e-Health dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan di Puskesmas Pucangsewu Kota Surabaya, Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik ISSN 2303 - 341X Volume 4, Nomor 3, September - Desember 2016.
Denhardt, Janet V. and Robert B. Denhardt, 2007, The New Public Service Serving, Not Steering, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Desideria, dkk, 2007, Komunikasi Antarbudaya, Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Terbuka.
DPMPTSP DKI Jakarta 2020, Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (DPMPTSP) DKI Jakarta tahun 2020 hal. 9.
Dwiyanto, Agus, 2015, Manajemen Pelayanan Publik: Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Effendy, Khasan, 2010, Memadukan Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif, Bandung: CV. Indra Prahasta.
Ember, Carol R., dan Melvin Ember, 2016, Konsep Kebudayaan dalam Pokok- pokok Antropologi Budaya (editor T.O Ihromi), Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Gere, Charlie, 2008, Digital Culture (Second Edition), London: Reactions Book Ltd.
Goldsmith, Stephen and William D. Eggers, 2004, Governing by Network, the New Shape of the Public Sector, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
Heeks, Richard, 2006, Implementing and Managing eGovernment, London: SAGE Publications.
Hofstede, Geert and Gert Jan Hofstede, 2005, Cultures and Organizations Software of the Mind, New York: McGraw Hill.
Hooghe, Marc, 2011, “Political Culture” dalam John T. Ishiyama dan Marijke Breuning (editor), 21th Century Political Science A Reference Handbook (volume 1), California: Sage Publications Inc.
Indrajit, Richardus Eko, 2016, Electronic Government, Yogyakarta: Preinexus.
Koentjaraningrat, 2013, Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Lathrop, Daniel & Laurel Ruma (editor), 2010, Open Government Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice, , Sebastopol : O’reilly.
Millard, Jeremy, 2017, “Technology Innovations in Public Service Delivery for Sustainable Development” dalam Adegboyega Ojo, Jeremy Millard (editors), Government 3.0 – Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services Roadmaps, Enabling Technologies & Challenges, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Montargil, Filipe, 2010, “E-Government and Government Transformation, Technical Interactivity, Political Influence and Citizen Return”, dalam Paul G. Nixon dkk, Understanding E-Government in Europe, Issues And Challenges, New York: Routledge.
Nasrullah, Rulli, 2016, Media Sosial Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi, Bandung: Simbosa Mekatama Media.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Budi Sulistyowati, 2015, Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: PT Raja Grasindo Persada.
Subarsono, AG, 2006, Pelayanan Publik yang Efisien, Responsif, dan Non- Partisan, dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik (editor Agus Dwiyanto), Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Tapscott, Don, 2009, Grown Up Digital yang Muda yang Mengubah Dunia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Yannizar, et al. (2020). Analysis of Good Corporate Governance, Free Cash Flow, Leverage towards Earning Management, and Shareholder Wealth in Service Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal).P. 2567j-2567v.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3983
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 61 timesPDF - 33 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.