Reminding State Owned Enterprises (BUMN) Management Using the Principle of ’Business Judgment Rule’: A Preliminary Note

Teuku Syahrul Ansari

Abstract


This paper explains that the development of BUMN (state owned enterprises) as a corporation that carries out social and business missions is facing constitutional juridical problems and facing the challenges of globalization. Factually, at this time legal development cannot be separated from the influence of globalization. Globalization in the economic field has affected various fields of the business sector in the world.  This globalization is followed by the globalization of law, which causes substantially various laws and agreements to spread across national borders, which causes the merging of legal principles (especially in the economic sector) from one country to another . For Indonesia, the logical consequence of this development is the demand to harmonize the principles of economic law in Indonesia, with the principles of economic law in the international world. Without harmonization, Indonesia can be ostracized in international business activities, because there is no certainty for legal protection for business and investment activities that are commonly carried out globally. The Constitutional Court in case number 48 / PUU-XI / 2013 and case No. 62 / PUU-X1 / 2013 dated May 22, 2013 decided that management  BUMN  must use the principle of Business Jugment Rule. In the ruling, it was also stated that state owned finances were state finances. As a result, this ruling brings legal certainty about the position of finance of BUMN.

Keywords


state owned enterprises; globalization; economic law; principle; Business Jugment Rule; corporation; Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Hamid S. Attamimi dalam Arifin P. Soeria Atmadja, Ibid, pp. 10-11.

Aminuddin Ilmar, Hak Menguasai Negara Dalam Privatisasi BUMN, kencana Prenada Media Grup, Jakarta, 2012, p. 73.

Arifin P. Soeria Atmadja, Mekanisme Pertanggungjawaban Keuangan Negara: Suatu Tinjuan Yuridis, Jakarta: PT Gramedia, 1986, p. 9.

Arifin P. Soeria Atmaja, Keuangan Publik Dalam Perspektif Hukum: Teori, Praktik, dan Kritik, Badan Publisher of the Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, 2005, p. 96.

Arifin P Soeriatmaja, “Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Selaku Auditor dari Perspektif BUMN,” Business Law Journal, Volume No.26 No.1 of 2007, p. 26.

Bismar Nasution, “Pengaturan Dan Pengawasan Lembaga Jasa Keuangan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan”, Paper, Presented in the Socialization of Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority, Integrated Financial Services Industry Supervision, carried out by the Capital Market and Financial Institution Supervisory Agency in collaboration with the Medan Area University, Santika Hotel Medan, 19 June 2012, p. 2.

Bismar Nasution, “Tanggung jawab Direksi dan Komisaris Dalam Pengelolaan Perseroan Terbatas Bank”, Paper presented at the Bank Management Day Seminar, held by Bank Indonesia and the Banking Compliance Text Communication Forum. Surabaya, 21 February 2008. p 1. Dahlan Thaib, Jazim Hamidi and Ni’matul Huda, Teori Hukum dan Konstitusi, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1999, p. 91.

Byan A Camer, Black’s Law Dictionary, Thomson West, Massachusetts, p. 200.

Data observation, conducted by Sindonews.com, from

https://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/1308869/35/28-bank-terbesar-dunia-beraset-lebih-usd1-triliun-11-dari-asia-1527226276

Hendra Setiawan Boen, Bianglala Business Judgment Rule, PT Tata Nusa, Jakarta, 2008, p. 100.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi, print. II, Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2008, pp. 833-834.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi Ekonomi, PT. Kompas Media Nusantara, Jakarta 2010. P. IX.

Otto Eckstein, Keuangan Negara, terjemahan dari “Public Finance”, Jakarta: PT Bina Aksara, 1981, p. 45.

Peter V. Letsou, “Implications of Shareholder Diversification on Corporate Law And

Organization: The Case Of The Business Judgment Rule”, 77 Chicago-Kent Law Review (2001), p. 181.

Prasetio, Dilema BUMN Benturan Penerapan Business Judgment Rule (BJR), PT Rayyana Komunikasindo, Jakarta, 2014, pp. 143-144.

Prasetio, Dilemma BUMN Benturan Penerapan Business Judgement Rule (BJR) Dalam Keputusan Bisnis Direksi BUMN, Rayyana Komunikasindo, Jakarta, 2014, p. 79.

Ridwan Khairandy “Konsepsi Kekayaan Negara yang Dipisahkan Dalam Perusahaan Negara” Business Law Journal, Volume No.26 No.1 of 2007, p. 32.

Safri Nugraha, “Privatisasi BUMN, antara Harapan dan Kenyataan” Business Law Journal, Volume No.26 No.1 of 2007, p. 16.

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Tanggungjawab Pribadi Direksi dan Komisaris, Business Law Journal Volume 14, July 2001.

Sri Redjeki Hartono, Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia, Bayu Media Publishing, Malang, 2007, p. V.

Tjip Ismail, “Peranan BUMN dalam Perspektif Pendapatan Negara: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Pajak”” Business Law Journal, Volume No.26 No.1 of 2007, p. 40.

W. Riawan Tjandra, Hukum Keuangan Negara, Penerbit PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, Jakarta, 2006, pp. 1-3.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v2i3.390

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 335 times
PDF - 227 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.