_.gif)
_.gif)
The analysis of Business Competition Law Against the Abuse of Trademark Holders Exclusive Rights
Abstract
This study aims to find and describe the criteria for abuse of the exclusive rights of brand holders. This research was conducted in Makassar using normative research methods by referring to the applicable legal rules and principles. In addition, it uses a comparative approach to find out the laws in force in other countries related to IPR and Business Competition Law. It provides an overview by presenting case illustrations to harmonize with applicable regulations in Indonesia. The collected material is then described to obtain a clear picture and answer the problems studied. The results obtained indicate that brand holders can abuse the exclusive rights of brand holders by looking at the criteria based on the IPR rules and the Business Competition Law and the illustrations of the cases described in this paper.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agung Sujatmiko, Bambang Sugeng, “Monopoli Pada Lisensi Merek Terkenal dan Kaitannya dengan Persaingan Usaha”.
Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property.
Asmuni, et al. (2020). Implementation of the principle of sale and purchase transactions through MLM in Brand Branch (BC) PT. Herba Penawar Alwahida Indonesia (HPAI) Tanjungbalai. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 3, No. 4, Page: 3376-3385
Davide Campari-Milano SpA, Kasus 78/253, [1978] 2 CMLR 397.
Exclusive Teritorial and Customer Restrictions; Hearings Before the Subcommitee on Monopolies and Commercial Law of the Committee on the Judicary House of Representatives,. Serial no. 41,. U.S Government Printing Office Washington,. 1976.
Hasbir Paserangi, Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Software Program Komputer di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 18, 2011.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1966/9. Diakses pada tanggal 10 April 2021
Ida Ayu Citra Kusuma, I Ketut Sudantra, “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Eksklusif Pemilik Merek di Indonesia Terhadap Pelanggaran Merek dalam Bentuk Perjanjian Lisensi”.
Irene Calboli, “The Sunset of “Quality Control” in Modern Trademark Licensing”, American Law Review, Vol. 57, 2007.
Jened, Rahmi. Interface Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual dan Hukum Persaingan (Penyalahgunaan HKI), . Rajawali Pers,. Depok,. 2013.
Lordh, Hannah, “Quality Control in Trademark Licensing – a Privilege or an Obligation? With a law and economic perspective it is examined ho EU trademark law deals with quality control with trademark licensing”, 2018.
Machnicka, Agniezka, “Trademark Licensing Agreements in Light of the EC Competition Rules”, 2018.
Margono, Suyud. Hukum Anti Monopoli, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2018.
Marlizar, et al. (2020). The Role of Market Orientation and Creativity in Affecting the Marketing Performance of Market Traders in Aceh Market Banda Aceh City. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal).P. 1114-1127
Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Merek : Cara Mudah Mempelajari Undang-Undang Merek, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007
Moosehead / Whitbread, (90/186 / EEC), OJ L 100/32, 20/04/1990.
Peraturan Komisi Nomor 2 tahun 2009 Tentang Pedoman Penerapan Pengecualian Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terhadap Perjanjian yang Berkaitan dengan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.
Peraturan Pemerintah no. 36 tahun 2018 tentang Pencatatan Perjanjian Lisensi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.
Rene Joliet, “Trademark Licensing Agreements Under the EEC Law of Competition”, Northwestern Journal of International law & Business, Vol. 5, 1983.
Romdonny, J., Rosmadi, M. L. N. (2019). Factors Affecting Customer Loyalty in Products. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 2, No 1, Page: 337-343
Ryan Gabay, “Sunbeam: A Ray of Hope for Trademark Licensees”, 82 Fordham Law Review 245, 2013.
Sherman Act https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/9-5020833?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true. Diakses pada tanggal 10 April 2021 Pukul 16.00
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
United States v. Sealy, 388 U.S. 350, 356 n.3 (1967).
Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. 2013.
Windsurfing International Inc. v. Commission, Case 193/83, [1986] ECR 611.
Winner Sitorus, Kepentingan Umum dalam Perlindungan Paten, Jurnal Yuridika, Vol. 29 No. 1, 2014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3683
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1009 timesPDF - 40 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.