Counseling Analysis of Criminal Actions on the Judge's Decision Number 55 / PID.B/2015/PN-BNA AND 79/PID.B/2013/PN.SKA.

Rini Mihartika, Rizanizarli Rizanizarli, Suhaimi Suhaimi


In light of the arrangements of Article 143 section (2) letter B of the Criminal System Code that the material necessities of the public prosecution should portray cautiously, obviously, and the criminal demonstration that is being accused of referencing the overall setting of the wrongdoing being perpetrated. Notwithstanding, in the choice No.55/PID.B/2015/PN-BNA and the Surakarta Locale Court Choice Number 79/PID.B/2013/PN.SKA the unmistakable components alluded to in the article have not been satisfied just as in the legitimate contemplations of the adjudicator's choice. , which doesn't plainly hold back the juridical realities uncovered at the preliminary. Since the appointed authority can't choose a case outside of the public investigator's prosecution. This composing plans to see and discover how the appointed authorities' contemplations in these 2 cases made the adjudicators just interested in 1 criminal demonstration and how the adjudicator settled on concursus. To accomplish this objective, the scientist utilizes a regulating legitimate exploration technique that leaves from lawful issues with a similar strategy. This review utilizes optional information sources comprising of essential lawful materials, auxiliary lawful materials that incorporate authority archives, books, and examination brings about the type of reports. The information was examined by subjective strategies. The outcomes showed that the appointed authority was considered unseemly in considering his choice where the sentence got by the litigant was not equivalent with what activities the respondent had submitted against the choice No.55/PID.B/2015/PN-BNA and the Surakarta Locale Court Choice Number 79/PID .B/2013/PN.SKA. It is suggested that the Public Examiner (Prosecutor) should be more cautious in setting up his arraignment as per Article 143 section (2) of the Criminal Technique Code. Similarly, the appointed authority in giving his choice. It is trusted that the appointed authority in giving the choice should contain juridical realities by considering the realities uncovered at the preliminary, so the choice given by the adjudicator doesn't contain blunders in settling on the choice, so nobody is hurt and upsets the general population by the appointed authority's choice.


counseling analysis; criminal actions; criminal technique code

Full Text:



Abdul Muiz, Praktek Hukum Pidana, Laboratorium Klinis Hukum, Darussalam. 2003

Adami Chazawi, Tindak Pidana Mengenai Kesopanan, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta. 2005

Ali Mahrus, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Pertama,Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 2011

Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Edisi Kedua), Sinar Grafika,

Jakarta. 2008

Bambang Waluyo. Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 2000

Erdianto Effendi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar, Refika Aditama, Bandung. 2011

Gatot Supromo, Surat Dakwaan dan Putusan Hakim yang Batal Demi Hukum, Penerbit Djambatan, Jakarta. 1998

Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita .Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, Surabaya. 2003

Kanter, E.Y dan Sianturi S.R. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Storia Grafika, Jakarta. 2002

Karjadi, M dan R. Soesilo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana dengan Penjelasan Resmi dan Komemtar. Politeia Bogor, Sukabumi. 2012

Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya. Alumni, Jakarta. 2007

Leden Marpaung. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Di Kejaksaan & Pengadilan Negeri Upaya Hukum dan Eksekusi), Bagian Kedua, Edisi Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 2011

Moeljatno. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Kedelapan,Edisi Revisi, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. 2008

Rizanizarli, Mohd. Din, dan Nurhafifah. Hukum Acara Pidana, Cetakan I Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam Banda Aceh. 2012

Soedirjo, Jaksa dan Hakim dalam Proses Pidana, Akademika Presindo, Jakarta. 1985

Soesilo, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politeia Bogor, Sukabumi. 1995

Teguh Prasetyo. Hukum Pidana (Edisi Revisi).Rajawali Pers, Yogyakarta. 2012

Waluyadi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Djambatan, Jakarta. 2003

Yahya Harahap, M. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan (Edisi Kedua), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 2008.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor: 55/Pid.B/2015/PN.BNA.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor: 79/Pid.B/2013/PN.SKA.

Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung RI Nomor: SE-04/J.A/II/1993

Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung Muda Tindak Pidana Umum Nomor: B-607/E/II/1993.

Digilib Unila, “Pengertian Pidana Perkosaan., diakses pada tanggal 28 April 2021 pukul 13.44 Wib.

Letezia Tobing, ”Perbedaan ‘Turut Melakukan’ dengan ‘Membantu Melakukan’ Tindak Pidana”,, diakses pada tanggal 5 Juni 2021 pukul 23.00 Wib.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 66 times
PDF - 45 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.