Public Procurements Performance Measurement in Indonesian FDA According to Head of National Public Procurement Agency’s Circular Letter Number 2 of Year 2021 Concerning Procurement Governance Index

Dyah Meita Retno Murti, Utomo Sarjono Putro

Abstract


Public procurement defined as purchasing process of goods, services and works, by governments. Government as public procurement entity are expected to conduct the process under highly standards, to report it transparently and to ensure its efficiency and effectiveness, under value of money principle. In accordance with this issue, Indonesia governments continuously develop public procurement system, led by The National Public Procurement Agency. E-procurement system was built, transactional covering the whole cycle, and public procurement regulations are revised as an adaptation of national economic development. In order to evaluate governance of procurement process, The Public Procurement Policy Agency develop set of performance indicator to reflect internal procurement governance of public procurement accounts, as issued in Head of National Public Procurement Agency’s Circular Letter Number 2 Year 2021. This indicator also acts as a measurement aspect of the bureaucratic reform that must be implemented by government ministries/institutions, including The Indonesia Food and Drug Agency. The purpose of this study is to capture The Indonesia Food and Drug Agency procurements governance according to Head of Public Procurement Policy Agency’s Circular Letter Number 2 Year 2021. Considering that the indicator has just implemented in 2021, there would be some internal hindrance that potentially influence the performance of public procurements which may affect its continuity. This condition can cause delays in the utilization of output so that the principles of efficiency and effectiveness can’t be achieved. 25 internal public procurements practitioners and stakeholder participated in this research. 25 potential problems were identified and analyzed under Kepner-Tregoe situation appraisal. The result of this research expected to be useful to determine which public procurement strategies should be implemented to overcome obstacles.


Keywords


public procurement, bureaucratic reform, procurement governance index, Indonesia Food and Drug Agency, government policy, performance measurement

Full Text:

PDF

References


BPOM. (2020). Laporan Kinerja Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Tahun 2020. Jakarta

BPOM. (2020). Peraturan BPOM Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Unit Pelaksana Teknis di Lingkungan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. Jakarta.

Presiden RI. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah.

Presiden RI. (2021). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah.

LKPP. (2021). Peraturan Kepala Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah No 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Perencanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah

OECD (2017), Public Procurement for Innovation: Good Practices and Strategies, OECD Public Governance. Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265820-en

LKPP. (2021). Surat Edaran Kepala Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 tentang Penjelasan Indeks Tata Kelola Pengadaan Minimal Baik sebagai Aspek Indikator “Antara” Dalam Indeks Reformasi Birokrasi. Jakarta

LKPP. (2021). Peraturan Kepala Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah No 10 Tahun 2021 tentang Unit Kerja Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa

Spagnolo, Giancarlo, Andreas H. Glas. (2021). Chapter 4 Calculating the Costs and Savings of Public Procurement. The Challenges of Public Procurements Reforms. Routledge. London and New York.

LKPP. (2019). Norma Standar Prosedur Manual Model Kematangan UKPBJ. Jakarta

Presiden RI (2015) Instruksi Presiden RI No 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah

Latino, Robert J., Kenneth C. Latino, Mark A. Latino (2019). Root Cause Analysis. CRC Press Taylor & Francis group. 4th Edition. Boca Raton.

Karyono, O., and Agustina, K. (2019). Determining the Priority Strategy in the Implementation of E-Government through Swot Analysis Model. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (2): 66-74.

Kepner, Charles H, Benjamin B. Tregoe. (1981). The New Rational Manager. Princeton Research press. New Jersey




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.3361

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 42 times
PDF - 24 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.