Determination of the Value of Acquisition of Tax Objects by the Agency of Revenue, Financial Management, and Regional Assets in Gresik Regency through E-BPHTB in Buying Transactions
Abstract
The results of this thesis research indicate that as stated in the legislation, specifically Article 87 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Regional Levies that the Acquired Value of Tax Objects (NPOP) for buying and selling is based on the price transaction. In addition to the law, Article 84 Paragraph (2) of the Gresik Regency Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2011 concerning Regional Taxes also confirms that NPOP for buying and selling is based on the transaction price. The Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia also explains in Article 1 Number 3 Regulation of the Minister of Finance (PMK) No.186/PMK.03/2019 concerning Classification of Tax Objects and Procedures for Determining the Sale Value of Land and Building Tax Objects that the determination of the Sales Value of Tax Objects (NJOP) based on the fair sale and purchase transaction price. Based on the above laws and regulations, the Gresik Regency BPPKAD in determining the Tax Object Acquisition Value (NPOP) for buying and selling BPHTB that does not match the transaction price and even exceeds the transaction price or PBB is not the authority of the Gresik Regency BPPKAD even though the process is already using the online system, namely through e-BPHTB because there is no legal regulation until now and the Gresik Regency BPPKAD itself said that the determination of NPOP for BPHTB payments due to buying and selling uses the Self Assessment System, where the taxpayer himself calculates the amount of tax to be paid. Based on the above laws and regulations, the Gresik Regency BPPKAD in determining the Tax Object Acquisition Value (NPOP) for buying and selling BPHTB that does not match the transaction price and even exceeds the transaction price or PBB is not the authority of the Gresik Regency BPPKAD even though the process has used the online system, namely through e-BPHTB because there is no legal regulation until now and also the Gresik Regency BPPKAD itself said that the determination of NPOP for BPHTB payments due to buying and selling uses the Self Assessment System, where the taxpayer himself calculates the amount of tax to be paid.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, C. (1993). Hukum Pajak Elementer, Eresco, Bandung.
Hartati, N. (2013). Pengantar Perpajakan, CV. Pustaka Setia, Bandung, 2015 Diana Sari, Konsep Dasar Perpajakan, Rapika Aditama, Bandung, 2013, hlm.40.
Hasil wawancara dengan Kepala Bagian PBB dan BPHTB, Bapak Kamsi, S.H., pada tanggal 16 Juni 2021, Pukul 13.45 WIB.
Hendayana, Y., et.al. (2021). How Perception use of e-Filling Technology Enhance Knowledge of Indonesian Disability Taxpayers and Impact Tax Compliance. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 4 (2): 1687-1696.
Kusyeni, R., et.al. (2021). Business Strategies and Utilization of Tax Insentive Policies During the Covid-19 Pandemic and Implementation of Restrictions for Community Activities (PPKM). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 4 (3): 6309-6316.
Marpaung, A. (2020). Zakat Regulation as a Reduction of Income Tax in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (3): 2109-2116.
Pasal 1 Nomor 10 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2009 Nomor 130, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5049).
Pasal 37 Ayat (1) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1997 Nomor 59, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3696).
Pasal 87 Ayat (4) dan (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2009 Nomor 130, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5049).
Siregar, R., Nasution, I.R., and Arifin, M.A. (2019). The Effect of Corporate Taxpayer Compliance, the Increase of Corporate Taxpayers' Number and Tax Audits on Income Tax Receipts of Article 25 with Taxation Sanctions as a Moderating Variable in KPP Pratama Medan Petisah. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (4): 385-400.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.3194
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 59 timesPDF - 32 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.