_.gif)
_.gif)
Enhance Witness Protection for Corruption Eradication Cases of Criminal Law Policy
Abstract
Witness protection policies in corruption cases need to be optimized because they can be an alternative legal instrument in efforts to eradicate corruption. This shows that the protection of witnesses and victims is an important and urgent legal aspect; this is because the criminal law policy in the process of eradicating corruption places more emphasis on the perpetrators and pays less attention to the witnesses involved in legal investigations. It is necessary to optimize the role of LPSK in criminal law policies, including in providing protection for witnesses in cases of eradicating corruption, all elements of society hope that it will not become an unresolved problem. So far, criminal law policies in efforts to eradicate corruption have placed more emphasis on the perpetrators. Therefore, it is important to carry out legal reforms to the witness protection law in the process of eradicating corruption. It is necessary to optimize the role of LPSK in criminal law policies, including in providing protection for witnesses in cases of eradicating corruption; therefore, it is important to carry out legal reforms to the witness protection law in the process of eradicating corruption. It is necessary to optimize the role of LPSK in criminal law policies, including in providing protection for witnesses in cases of eradicating corruption; therefore, it is important to carry out legal reforms to the witness protection law in the process of eradicating corruption.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adji, IS (2006). Corruption of State Apparatus Policies and Criminal Law. Jakarta: CV Diadit Media.
Diakhate, B. (The Ups and Downs of the Nigerian Society: A Satirical View on Socio-political Matters in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus (2004) and Sefi Atta’s a Bit of Difference (2013). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (2): 1-6.
DPR RI, Results of the Working Committee on Witness Protection Bill“, Jakarta: DPR RI On July 12, 2006, p.45.
Eddyono, SW, “Seeing the Prospects of the Protection of “Cooperating Offenders” in Indonesia”, Journal of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency Vol.1 No.1, 2011, p.21.
Hamzah, A, "Since the Age of Prophet Musa Corruption Has Existed". Jakarta: Justice Forum Magazine, No.41, February 2007
Hikmawati,P,“Protection Efforts Whistleblowers and Justice Collaborators in Corruption Crimes”. Journal of the State of Law, Vol.4, No.1, June, 2013, p.88.
Iksan, M, “Legislative Policy Concerning Witness Protection in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia”, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.14, No.2, September 2011, pp.316-334.
Irawan, A, "Protection of Whistleblower Witnesses and Justice Collaborators in the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption", Alhuriyah Journal, Vol.2, No.1, 2017, p.23.
Purba, I.G., Syahrin, A. (2019). Demand against Law and Using Authority in Corruption Criminal Action. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 2 (4): 194-206.
Setiawan, MA, “The Urgency of Witness and Victim Protection in the Criminal Justice System”, Journal of Law and Community Dynamics, Vol.5, No.2, April 2008, p.133.
Soedarso, T, “Witness and Victim Protection in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System”, Witness and Victim Protection Media Magazine, Jakarta: LPSK, I edition January-February 2010, p.14.
Zulyadi, R. (2020). Judge's Role in Court to Eradicate Corruption According to Law Number 20 in 2001 (Study of Decision 16/PID.SUS.K/2011/PN.MDN). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 3 (2): 1280-1288.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.3063
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 47 timesPDF - 49 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.