Analysis of Non-Government Organizations Position in Filling Pre-Trial for the Purpose of Determining the Suspect

Peter Jeremiah Setiawan, Lolita Fitriyana, Puri Indah Sukma Negara, Novia Choirunnisa

Abstract


After  Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 98 / PUU-X / 2012, NGO include third parties with an interest in submitting pre-trial proceedings by terminating investigations or terminating proceedings, but related to Post- Decision of Constitutional Court Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014, it can be seen that there is an extension of pre-trial proceedings, one of which is the suspect's determination. It actually raises concerns about pre-trial object posed by NGO, whether or not it requires the determination of a suspect, it given that it is not written if it looks at grammatically. Based on background above, this research analyzes about first, can non-governmental organizations submit pre-trial applications for the purpose of determining a suspect? Secondly, what is the concern of juries’ respect to the position of Non-Governmental Organization that submitted a pre-trial application for the purpose of determining the suspect? This research is a normative legal research with an approach to laws, a philosophical approach and a case approach. Based on this research, it has been identified that First, NGO should first submit pre-trial applications for the purpose of assessing a suspect. Whereas, since Article 77(a), which is incidentally the subject-matter of pre-trial proceedings for NGO, has been extended, it should be interpreted that NGO also send pre-trial applications for the purpose of determining the suspect. Secondly, in some justices' reflections based on Constitutional Court's Decision Number: 98 / PUU-X / 2012 on May 21, 2013 jo. The justice considered, in Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, that the complainant as an NGO has a legal role in bringing a preliminary ruling against the object of suspect’s determination.

Keywords


non-government organizations; pre-trial; determining of suspect

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, A. R. I. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Kewajiban Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Tenaga Kerja Asing Di Indonesia. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 4.

Abdullah, S. (2010). Segi-Segi Pokok HAM Dalam Kuhap. Jurnal Lex Specialis, Edisi Khusus, 2.

Agustine, O. V. (2018). Jurisprudence Enforceability on Judicial Review Authority in the Constitutional Court Decision. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(3), 643.

Azis, A. S. dan A. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Barus, Z. (2017). Analisis Filosofis Tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Sosiologis. Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 313.

Budiyanto, C., Prananto, Tan, F, T. (2019). Designing Embedded Case Study Research Approach in Educational Research. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 3(1), 1–18.

Harahap, M. Y. (2002). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (edisi kedua). Sinar Grafika.

Kafara, S. (2020). Analisis Hukum Pelaksanaan Putusan Praperadilan terhadap Perkara Setya Novanto oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Nomor 97/Pid.Prap/2017/PN.Jkt-Sel tanggal 29 September 2017). Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(1), 88.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum : Edisi Revisi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mawar, S. (2016). Metode Penemuan Hukum (Interpretasi Dan Konstruksi) Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Hukum. Justitia, 1(1), 10.

Muwahid. (2017). Metode Penemuan Hukum (Rechtsvinding) Oleh Hakim Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Responsif. Al-Hukama, 7(1), 225–248.

R, A. S. R. S. (2020). Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia, Kajian mengenai Ilmu dan Teori Perundang-Undangan serta Pembentukannya,. Social Political Genius.

Ramdan, A. (2014). Problematika Legal Standing Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(4), 739.

S., M. F. I. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 1 Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Kansius.

Selznick, P. N. P. (2018). Hukum Responsif. Nusa Media.

Setiawan, P., Nugraha, X., & Enrick, M. (2020). Analisis Kedudukan Keterangan Korban Terkait Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Dalam Lingkungan Keluarga: Sebuah Antinomi Antara Hukum Materil Dengan Formil. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 9(1), 99–118.

Sitorus, D. (2015). Efektivitas Pra Peradilan Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Bengkalis. JOM Fakultas Hukum, 2(1), 2.

Sutiyoso, B. (2006). Metode Penemuan Hukum. UII Press.

Taqiuddin, H. U. (2017). Penalaran Hukum (Legal Reasoning) Dalam Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 193.

Wicaksono, M. B. R. (2020). Assessing The Rights Of Women Victims Of Home Violence During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Lex Scientia, 4(2), 12.

Yuliartha, I. G. (2009). Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Perspektif Kini Dan Masa Mendatang Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Law Reform, 5(1), 7.

Yuristia, R. (2016). Pengaruh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 Terhadap Pengajuan Praperadilan Mengenai Penetapan Status Ongky Syahrul Ramadhona Sebagai Tersangka. Jurnal Verstek, 4(3), 182.

Zamroni. (2020). Penafsiran Hakim dalam Sengketa Kontrak : Kajian Teori dan Praktik Peradilan. Scopindo Media Pustaka.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i1.1632

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 94 times
PDF - 101 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.