Ethical Challenges to Determination Brainstem Death in Intensive Care and Its Medicolegal Aspects: A Case Report
Abstract
A 21-year-old female patient treated in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to a traffic accident, after two days of treatment was declared brainstem death, the patient's family asked the doctor to continue treatment efforts in the hope of improving the patient's condition. The team of doctors differed in response to the patient's family request. Doctor A said that brain stem death meant that the patient had died and that no further action was needed, but Doctor B was of the opinion that the medical indications were absent but needed to provide an opportunity for the patient's family to see the patient's condition until he could eventually die naturally. According to doctor B it is not easy to determine brain stem death because it has several ethical and medicolegal consequences such as termination of life assistance, a certificate of brain stem death, and post-brain stem death organ transplantation. The medical decision taken is to keep the patient in care and after 3 days the patient is declared dead.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Academy of Neurology (AAN). 1995. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology,. Practice parameters for determining brain death in adults (summary statement). Neurology. 45(5):1012-4.
Beauchamp TL and Childress JF. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
Greer, D. M., Varelas, P. N, and Haque, S., and Wijdicks, E. F. M. 2008. Variability of Brain Death Determination Guidelines in Leading US Neurologic Institutions. Neurology. 70:284–289
Hanum, S. L., Aulia, D., and Rochadi, K. 2020. Patient Decision Making in the Choice of a Referral Hospital in Hospital of Subulussalam City in 2018. Britain International of Exact Sciences (BIoEx) Journal (2): 368-376.
Indonesian Law, 2014. Regulation of Minister of Health of Republic of Indonesia No. 37 of 2014 concerning Determination of Death and Utilization of Donor Organs. Jakarta.
Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. 2010. Clinical Ethics a Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine.7th ed. The McGraw Hill Companies. New York.
Kusmaryanto JB. 2012. Ethical problem at the end of life. Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities. Bioethics Course, Yogyakarta 16 – 20 April 2012.
Laio S., Ito S. 2010. Brain Death: Ethical Challenges to Palliative Care Concepts of Family Care. j.jpainsyimman; 40(2): 309-313.
Machado C. 2010. Diagnosis of Brain Death. Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology. Hanava Cuba.Vol. 2.
Medical Faculty of Universitas Indonesia (MFUI). 2012. Buku Ajar Anestesiologi. Departemen Anestesiologi dan Intensive Care Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia.
Pandhita GS. 2010. Kematian Batang Otak. SMF Saraf, Rumah Sakit Islam Jakarta Pondok Kopi, Jakarta Timur.
Rampen T.A.A.H. 2006. Dikotomi Euthanasia: Aktif dan Pasif. Pertemuan Nasional jaringan Bioetika dan Humaniora Kesehatan Indonesia. Surabaya. 199-213.
Samil R.S. 2001. Euthanasia. Dalam Etika Kedokteran Indonesia. Edisi 2. Yayasan Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo. Jakarta. 92-99.
Suryadi, T. 2017. Aspek Bioetika-Medikolegal Penundaan Dan Penghentian Terapi Bantuan Hidup Pada Perawatan Kritis. Jurnal Kedokteran Syiah Kula. 17(1): 60-64.
Suryadi, T., and Kulsum. 2020. Identification of Ethical and Medicolegal Problems in the Care of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit Britain International of Exact Sciences (BIoEx) Journal (2): 547-555.
Yuwono BS. 2005. Euthanasia. Dalam Buku Kajian Bioetik 2005. Darmadipura MS (ed). Unit Bioetik Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya:209-220.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i3.1108
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 290 timesPDF - 110 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.